Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seishi Maru And HOW would that be bad? That woudlbe awesome. Would make game more interesting and fun.. and we play games because of that! Because citadels can shoot only very big and very not moving targets. For anythi...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 17:47:00
|
62. 1.5 months to Dominion. How much do we know? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Caldor Mansi on 21/10/2009 17:30:45 Here's the little what I know about Dominion: 1) It is the expansion with least testing time spent on major features since...don't remember :) 2) It is the least thought-out across all introduce...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 17:30:00
|
63. Why i think the flood of alts is a problem. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You can't really prevent people having alts but you could at least allow only 1 instance of EVE to be run per computer regardless of how many accounts you have. Running 2 or more characters at the same time kills whole idea of MMO. The best woul...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 17:19:00
|
64. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mynas Atoch Edited by: Mynas Atoch on 21/10/2009 16:43:10 We really need you to separate the roles for sovereignty maintenance from the roles for POS. You won't find an alliance in the game that won't support this. Y...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 16:54:00
|
65. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seishi Maru I can counter all your arguments with same level of logic as yours: 1) You can say the same about maelstrom being shot at its lowest ressit by ammar ship and dealing EM heavy damage on an ammar ship. Doe snto c...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 16:01:00
|
66. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: HeliosGal theres more reward in holding fewer systems that are more developed now. Less remote pos bashing more system to system fighting. Which is about time. Now some bigger alliances can hold 800 systems and pay something...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 13:30:00
|
67. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Incognito Because there is a hefty bill attached to holding a system. Before you asked the numbers are still being tweaked, so I won't say anything on that. But you may want to give up sovereignty in a system that you...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 13:21:00
|
68. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Caldor Mansi on 21/10/2009 12:49:15 Originally by: HeliosGal ok so essetially alliacnes becme more the level that delegate roles to corps that they trust to hold sov for alliance, corps can defect and take sov with them. Wel...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 12:48:00
|
69. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Caldor Mansi on 21/10/2009 12:33:36 Originally by: CCP Incognito What will happen to the upgrades is up to you to find out. We are not going to make it so that you are immune to being stabbed in the back by your own coup ...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 12:33:00
|
70. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: HeliosGal so thers a max of 64 roles or 32 roles ingame. Why not just create a new subgroup of roles relating to sov strucutres, u can then push the new roles into the CEO - director allocations and done . or is this not pos...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 12:17:00
|
71. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Panem EtCircenses I've never trained for Archeaology or Hacking because my scanning is pretty much only used for PVP, but are there Archeaology and Hacking sites in high sec that are suitable for new players? Panem Defin...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 12:10:00
|
72. Big over looked problem with new Sov System - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Incognito Originally by: HeliosGal ah so basically it comes down to lazy and fast programming by ccp and not wanting to expand the role range ingame. Thats fair enough and understandable they want to leave open t...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 12:02:00
|
73. Fix the myrmidon and eos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Siigari Kitawa Bleh, all this comparing to HACs is ****ing me off, sorry. Right. Brutix: 7 Neutrons @ FN Anti w/ 3 MFS II + 5 Hammer IIs = 860 DPS Myrmidon: 6 Neutrons @ FN Anti w/ 3 MFS II + 2 Ogre II, 2 Hammer II, 1 Hob ...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 11:41:00
|
74. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Seishi Maru nope.. proposed changes ARE helpinga lot! And people that are pleased are in test server enjoying them instead of complaining here! THat is what you don 't see and what he can see. THe changes do not solve all...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 11:32:00
|
75. New Dev Blog: Adding flavor to your faction meal - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This is sad... 5 pages of whine about silly ship textue but absolutely no one minds the fact that the production of T2 ship require several POS, their defense and maintenance - ice harvesting, 0.0 ore mining and their refinement via simple and co...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 10:55:00
|
76. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Elisean So your just ignoring the tech 2 barrier? seriously, what the **** is wrong with the forums now a days lets see with tech 1 skills and a tech 1 ship, you will be about what... 25% effective? So what, you still n...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 09:49:00
|
77. Projectile Weapons - Balancing - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Washell Olivaw 4. None of us added anything new after the first 5 pages, but added 2 cents anyway. Sometimes you just need to cry out laud to be heard, even though it was said many times before... Proposed changes ar...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 08:39:00
|
78. Fix the myrmidon and eos - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: abrasive soap No, actually I solo with that omen fit. If you don't even use it why are you commenting on how I should use it. Oh and it is also far faster than the vexor, thorax and plate rupture while doing more damage at ...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 08:33:00
|
79. CSM Vote Match - a candidate comparison website for CSM4 - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Edited by: Caldor Mansi on 21/10/2009 00:42:30 Elementary question needs to be added to survey: Do you think EVE is dying? EDIT: I run the survey and it seems I can't get the list of other candidates score offered at step 4. Are you the only...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 00:39:00
|
80. Dumbing down eve yet again. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The difference between Level 4 and 5 skill is minor in performance but it is a corner stone for specialization mechanics. Level 5 requirements means that: Only person who devoted his time can do it. Level 4 requirements means that: Only person w...
- by Caldor Mansi - at 2009.10.21 00:01:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |